Edited (3)
| Location | Was | Now | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
langgraph/rules/platform-deployment.md ×2 | claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 | claude-sonnet-4-6 | stale model id in a LangGraph config code sample |
cookbook/claude-design-handoff.mdx:35 | CC 2.1.78 or later | CC 2.1.148 or later | plugin-prereq floor (real floor is 2.1.148) |
getting-started/release-channels.mdx:57 | >= 2.1.80 | >= 2.1.148 | stable-channel compat floor |
Verified in context, left alone
| Cite | Class | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
doctor.mdx / workflow-architect.mdx "CC >= 2.1.77" | per-feature gate | plugin-validate / 128k tokens introduced then — legit + generated |
ai-llm.mdx "CC 2.1.71 pipelines" | feature fact | skill description, historically accurate + generated |
upgrade-assessment/knowledge-compatibility.md | migration table | old→new model mappings must keep old ids |
cost-estimator.ts sonnet-4-5 pricing | historical pricing | replays old sessions accurately (kept intentionally) |
release-channels.mdx :41/:73/:100 "CC < 2.1.80: marketplace add" | vestigial | install-METHOD legacy, not a floor — flagged, out of scope for this sweep |
The discipline here is the point: a "2.1.78" can be a stale floor or a legit per-feature minimum — opposite handling. Each cite was read in context; only the 3 genuine floor/sample staleness items were changed.