Strategic Implementation of Hierarchical Knowledge Clustering for BrainLayer: A Multi-Level Architectural Framework for Large-Scale Markdown Repositories
The architectural evolution of knowledge management systems has transitioned from simple keyword-based retrieval to complex semantic structures that attempt to mirror the human brain's optimization of memory retrieval through strengthened neural pathways.1 For a system such as BrainLayer, which aims to organize 245,000 distinct semantic units or "chunks" into a cohesive 3-level hierarchy, the technical challenges are multifaceted, involving high-dimensional vector spaces, structure-aware parsing of Markdown files, and the maintenance of stable cluster identities amidst frequent content revisions.2 This report provides an exhaustive technical roadmap for implementing such a system, focusing on the synergy between density-based and graph-based clustering algorithms, the utilization of Markdown header structures as structural priors, and the deployment of robust automation pipelines for dynamic content updates.
Algorithmic Foundations for High-Dimensional Clustering at Scale
The primary challenge in managing 245,000 chunks—each typically represented by a 1024-dimensional embedding vector—lies in the curse of dimensionality and the computational complexity of traditional hierarchical methods.4 Algorithms like HDBSCAN (Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) and Leiden offer distinct pathways for addressing these challenges, each with varying implications for performance and stability.4
Density-Based Persistence and the HDBSCAN Paradigm
HDBSCAN represents a significant advancement over earlier density-based algorithms like DBSCAN by introducing a hierarchical approach that identifies clusters of varying densities.4 At its core, HDBSCAN transforms the space according to the local density of data points, effectively "stretching" the distance between sparse regions to make the clustering more robust to noise.4 This transformation is governed by the core distance—the distance to a point's $k$-th nearest neighbor—and the mutual reachability distance, defined as:


$$\text{d}_{\text{mreach}-k}(a, b) = \max\{\text{core}_k(a), \text{core}_k(b), d(a, b)\}$$
where $d(a, b)$ is the original metric distance between points $a$ and $b$.8
For a corpus of 245,000 chunks, HDBSCAN constructs a minimum spanning tree (MST) from the mutual reachability graph, which is then converted into a hierarchy of connected components.4 The algorithm's unique "condensing" phase allows the system to prune the complicated hierarchy into a smaller tree based on a min_cluster_size parameter.8 Rather than viewing every split as the birth of two new clusters, HDBSCAN interprets small splits as a persistent cluster "losing points," thereby identifying the most stable semantic groupings across the hierarchy.5 This stability is measured by the lifespan of a cluster in the hierarchy, providing a natural mechanism for identifying Level 1 "super-communities" and Level 2 "topic clusters" in BrainLayer.4
Graph-Based Community Detection and the Leiden Algorithm
In contrast to density-based methods, the Leiden algorithm operates on a graph-based representation of the data, typically a $k$-nearest neighbor (k-NN) graph where nodes are text chunks and edges represent semantic similarity.1 Leiden is a hierarchical clustering algorithm that recursively merges communities into single nodes by greedily optimizing a modularity score.6 It was developed to overcome the limitations of the Louvain method, which frequently produced poorly connected communities due to a lack of refinement during the node-moving phase.6
The Leiden process consists of three primary phases: local moving of nodes to maximize modularity, refinement of the partition to ensure internal connectivity, and aggregation of the network based on the refined partition.9 This recursive aggregation naturally generates a hierarchy where the output of one iteration serves as the input for the next, forming super-nodes that can be mapped directly to BrainLayer's desired levels.11
Metric
	HDBSCAN
	Leiden
	BIRCH
	Computational Complexity
	$O(n \log n)$ to $O(n^2)$
	Highly scalable (millions of nodes)
	$O(n)$ (Linear)
	Multi-density Support
	Excellent
	Dependent on resolution parameter
	Limited
	Noise Handling
	Explicit "Noise" category (-1)
	Forces nodes into communities
	Sensitive to outliers
	Hierarchical Output
	Condensed Tree / Dendrogram
	Recursive Partitioning / Super-nodes
	Clustering Feature Tree
	Dimension Sensitivity
	Struggles in high dimensions without reduction
	Robust via k-NN graph construction
	Performance degrades in $>50$ dims
	For BrainLayer’s 245,000 chunks, Leiden's scalability makes it a strong candidate for Level 1 and Level 2 organization, while HDBSCAN’s noise tolerance ensures that outliers in the knowledge base do not distort the broader semantic structure.4
Integrating Markdown Header Structures as Structural Priors
Markdown is the primary storage format for BrainLayer, and its inherent header structure (e.g., #, ##, ###) provides an invaluable human-curated signal for hierarchical clustering.3 Leveraging this structure allows the system to bridge the gap between automated semantic discovery and intentional document design.3
Hierarchical Greedy Packing and Breadcrumb Context
Traditional chunking strategies often split documents at arbitrary character or token counts, which destroys semantic context and disrupts the hierarchical relationship between sections.3 BrainLayer's implementation must utilize "hierarchical greedy packing," an algorithm that respects the natural outline of a Markdown file.3 The process begins by checking if the entire document fits within a specified "hard cap" token limit; if it exceeds this limit, the algorithm splits the document at the highest available heading level (H1, then H2, etc.), ensuring that sibling sections are packed together until the limit is reached.3
Each generated chunk inherits a "breadcrumb" metadata field, representing its path in the document hierarchy (e.g., Project_BrainLayer > Architecture > Clustering_Logic).3 These breadcrumbs are essential for:
1. Semantic Search Quality: By vectorizing the breadcrumb along with the content, the chunk carries its structural context, significantly improving search precision.3
2. Cluster Seeding: The hierarchy implied by the Markdown headers can serve as "seeds" or constraints for the Leiden or HDBSCAN algorithms, ensuring that chunks from the same Markdown section are more likely to cluster together.15
3. Automated Labeling: When an LLM is used to name a cluster at Level 1 or Level 2, the breadcrumbs of its constituent chunks provide a high-fidelity summary of the cluster's focus.17
Normalization and Fuzzy Heading Matching
Real-world Markdown repositories often suffer from inconsistent formatting, such as inline headers, missing markers, or improper capitalization.13 Automated parsing logic must employ fuzzy matching to identify intended headings even when standard syntax is violated.13 For example, the headhunter framework recognizes specific rules for all-caps headings and colon-ending headings, treating them as structural pivots.13
Heading Style
	Hierarchical Rule
	Level Adjustment
	Standard # Markers
	Direct mapping (# = L1, ## = L2)
	Absolute level
	ALL CAPS Heading
	Treated as peer to previous same-style heading
	Contextual level
	Colon-Ending (Name:)
	Heading itself is deeper; following content deeper
	+1 Depth
	Bold (**Text**)
	Relative level based on preceding style
	Relative +/- 1
	By reconstructing the document hierarchy during the parsing phase, BrainLayer can standardize 245,000 chunks into a format that the clustering algorithms can ingest as a structured prior.13
Implementing the Three-Level Hierarchical Structure
Achieving a stable 3-level hierarchy requires a tiered approach that combines global community detection with local semantic refinement.1
Level 1: Super-Communities (The Global Domain)
The highest level of the BrainLayer hierarchy serves as the "Domain" layer, grouping the 245,000 chunks into 50–150 massive super-communities.1 This is best achieved through a low-resolution run of the Leiden algorithm, where the resolution parameter ($\gamma$) is tuned to favor larger, broader groupings.6
At this level, interpretability is maintained by using a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate "thematic signatures"—natural language questions or summaries that define the domain.17 The LLM does not process every chunk; instead, it analyzes the class-based TF-IDF (c-TF-IDF) keywords that distinguish that community from others.21
Level 2: Topic Clusters (The Functional Layer)
Level 2 provides the "Topic" layer, where super-communities are subdivided into more granular, cohesive units.12 Within each Level 1 community, a recursive pass of clustering is performed.17 HDBSCAN is particularly effective here, as it can identify nested sub-clusters and exclude noise points that do not clearly fit a specific topic.5
The logic for Level 2 must balance semantic similarity with the "subset property." While Louvain-based hierarchies enforce a strict tree structure where sub-clusters are strict subsets of their parents, Leiden offers more flexibility, allowing nodes to be dynamically reassigned across overlapping clusters for better modularity optimization.12 For BrainLayer, the "Materialized Path" storage model compensates for this lack of strict nesting by encoding the most stable path from the root to the chunk.23
Level 3: Semantic Units (The Granular Chunks)
The third level consists of the individual 245,000 chunks themselves.17 At this level, the focus is on efficient retrieval and "context-stitching".25 When a query matches a specific chunk, the system uses its hierarchical metadata to retrieve sibling chunks from the same Level 2 topic or Level 1 community, providing the LLM with a comprehensive context window.14
Strategies for Handling Frequent Edits and Revisions
Knowledge bases are dynamic by nature, and BrainLayer's hierarchy must accommodate frequent edits to .md files without requiring a complete re-clustering of the 245,000-chunk corpus.2
Approximate Prediction and Incremental Updates
A critical limitation of density-based clustering like HDBSCAN* is its transductive nature: adding new data points can theoretically alter the entire hierarchy by bridging previously separate clusters.8 To avoid the computational cost of full recalculation, the system should use the approximate_predict() function.26 This allows the system to hold the existing condensed tree fixed and determine where a new or edited chunk would fall based on its existing structure.26
Update Strategy
	Frequency
	Computational Cost
	Stability Impact
	Approximate Predict
	Immediate (per edit)
	Very Low
	High (Preserves IDs)
	Online Micro-Concepts
	Periodic (Batch)
	Medium
	Moderate
	Full Re-Clustering
	Rare (Strategic)
	High
	Low (May shift IDs)
	For content automation, BrainLayer should maintain a "drift buffer." When a critical threshold of new or edited chunks is reached, or when the average core distance of new points from existing clusters exceeds a predefined limit, a partial re-clustering is triggered for the affected Level 1 or Level 2 branches.2
Materialized Path and SQLite Storage Performance
The storage of the hierarchy must support rapid updates and complex traversals. For a system with 245,000 chunks, the "Materialized Path" model in SQLite is superior to adjacency lists or nested sets.23 By storing the full lineage of a chunk as a delimited string (e.g., 001/042/Chunk_99), BrainLayer can perform subtree retrievals and parent-child lookups with simple LIKE queries.24
Combining this with the sqlite-vec extension allows for a local RAG stack that is both performant and portable.25 When a file is edited, the system recalculates the embedding for the changed chunks, updates the sqlite-vec index, and re-assigns the hierarchical path using approximate_predict(), ensuring the automation pipeline remains fast and responsive.25
Multilingual Challenges: Hebrew-English Code-Switching
BrainLayer's operation in an environment characterized by Hebrew-English code-switching introduces specific requirements for embedding models and normalization.29
Embedding Model Performance and Language Tags
While models like BGE-large-en-v1.5 are benchmarks for English tasks, they often lose accuracy when faced with intra-sentential code-switching (e.g., "Hebrish").30 Multilingual models such as BGE-M3 or multilingual-e5-large are better suited for BrainLayer, as they are trained to represent multiple languages in a shared semantic space.32
For code-switched data, the "semantic load" is often carried by technical terms or product names embedded in a different matrix language.33 The training loss in many models is dominated by the matrix language, leading to inaccuracies at the "Points of Interest" (POI) where the language switch occurs.29 BrainLayer's ingestion pipeline should prioritize models that utilize a token-weighted cross-entropy loss, emphasizing learning at these switching locations.29
Normalization and Chunking for Mixed Language
To optimize retrieval, the system should avoid aggressive preprocessing that might strip out semantic markers in Hebrew or English.33 Preserving original casing for identifiers and chunking long mixed-language documents into coherent passages (rather than large, monolithic blocks) ensures that the embedding model can capture the intent despite the linguistic transition.33 Metadata such as languages_detected=["en","he"] should be stored to allow for "same-language-first" filtering during retrieval.33
Scoring Mechanisms and Expertise Metrics
To automate the evaluation of the knowledge hierarchy, BrainLayer must implement metrics that quantify the "richness" and "connectivity" of its clusters.34
Structural Quality: K, I, and C Scores
Knowledge Graph KPIs are essential for aligning technical clustering efforts with business outcomes.35 Three primary metrics can be applied to the BrainLayer hierarchy:
1. K-Score (Knowledge Score): Measures the ratio of unknown nodes and edges to known ones, providing a personalized metric for how much "new" information a cluster adds to the system.34
2. I-Score (Information Score): Uses information theory to assess the uncertainty of a graph structure. A well-organized, low-entropy Level 2 cluster indicates high thematic cohesion.34
3. C-Score (Causal Score): Measures the causal information conveyed by the graph, ensuring that relations between chunks are logical and non-arbitrary.34
Hierarchical Scoring for Retrieval
When multiple child chunks match a query, the system must determine how to score the corresponding parent Level 2 cluster.36 While not explicitly detailed in standard RAG documentation, effective strategies include weighted aggregation—where child scores are boosted by their depth in the hierarchy—or max-pooling, where the single most relevant chunk defines the parent's score.36 This allows BrainLayer to retrieve "context-dense" parents that contain multiple relevant sub-sections.3
Infrastructure and Resource Allocation
Managing 245,000 vectors requires strategic infrastructure choices, particularly on platforms like RunPod.37
GPU Selection: A100 vs. A40
The initial embedding of 245,000 chunks and the periodic re-clustering are bursty workloads that benefit from high-VRAM GPUs.37
GPU Model
	VRAM
	RunPod Cost (Approx)
	Use Case for BrainLayer
	NVIDIA A100 (80GB)
	80GB
	$1.39 - $2.17/hr
	High-speed initial embedding; heavy model fine-tuning
	NVIDIA A40 (48GB)
	48GB
	$0.40 - $0.85/hr
	Cost-effective periodic re-clustering; inference
	NVIDIA RTX 4090
	24GB
	$0.35 - $0.77/hr
	Real-time updates; development/testing
	For the 245k-chunk scale, the A40 (48GB) offers a superior balance of memory capacity and affordability, allowing the system to keep large distance matrices and graph structures in VRAM during the Leiden aggregation phase.38
Memory Constraints for In-Memory Clustering
Beyond VRAM, the system RAM is a critical bottleneck.6 The Leiden algorithm and MST construction for HDBSCAN are memory-intensive. For 245,000 chunks, a node and edge list (assuming $k=10$ for k-NN) can easily consume 64GB–128GB of RAM. Selecting a "Secure Cloud" instance on RunPod with 117GB–276GB of RAM is necessary to prevent OOM (Out of Memory) errors during global clustering.39
Conclusion: A Unified Vision for BrainLayer
The implementation of a 3-level hierarchical clustering system for BrainLayer represents a convergence of semantic technology and structural automation. By leveraging Markdown as a structural prior, the system ensures that automated organization aligns with human intent. The combination of Leiden's graph-based scalability and HDBSCAN's density-based stability provides a robust framework for managing 245,000 chunks. Furthermore, by adopting incremental update strategies and materialized path storage, BrainLayer can maintain its hierarchical integrity through frequent content revisions. This multi-layered approach—integrating high-performance embeddings, multilingual awareness, and rigorous structural metrics—positions BrainLayer as a highly sophisticated, automated knowledge environment capable of navigating the complexities of large-scale semantic data.
Works cited
1. Optimizing Knowledge Retrieval with Hierarchical Clustering | by Deniz Askin, Ph.D., accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@denizaskin/by-deniz-askin-and-rotem-weiss-27fdbdb75816
2. An incremental clustering algorithm based on semantic concepts ..., accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378236719_An_incremental_clustering_algorithm_based_on_semantic_concepts
3. Intelligent Document Chunking for PHP - Ben Bjurstrom, accessed February 14, 2026, https://benbjurstrom.com/php-markdown-chunker
4. Understanding HDBSCAN: A Deep Dive into Hierarchical Density ..., accessed February 14, 2026, https://arize.com/blog-course/understanding-hdbscan-a-deep-dive-into-hierarchical-density-based-clustering/
5. HDBSCAN Clustering: Complete Guide to Hierarchical Density-Based Clustering with Automatic Cluster Selection - Interactive | Michael Brenndoerfer, accessed February 14, 2026, https://mbrenndoerfer.com/writing/hdbscan-hierarchical-density-based-clustering-automatic-cluster-selection
6. Leiden - Neo4j Graph Data Science, accessed February 14, 2026, https://neo4j.com/docs/graph-data-science/current/algorithms/leiden/
7. HDBSCAN - Neo4j Graph Data Science, accessed February 14, 2026, https://neo4j.com/docs/graph-data-science/current/algorithms/hdbscan/
8. How HDBSCAN Works - Read the Docs, accessed February 14, 2026, https://hdbscan.readthedocs.io/en/latest/how_hdbscan_works.html
9. Leiden Clustering for Community Detection: A Step-by-Step Guide with Python Implementation | by Swapnil Agashe | Medium, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@swapnil.agashe456/leiden-clustering-for-community-detection-a-step-by-step-guide-with-python-implementation-c883933a1430
10. Leiden algorithm - Wikipedia, accessed February 14, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leiden_algorithm
11. leiden clustering explained - QBExpress, accessed February 14, 2026, http://www.qbexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Arhzh/leiden-clustering-explained
12. Understanding Leiden vs Louvain Clustering: Hierarchy and Subset Properties - Medium, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@vivekvjnk/understanding-leiden-vs-louvain-clustering-hierarchy-and-subset-properties-4d4e9c03a9f9
13. childmindresearch/headhunter: A parser for extracting headings and hierarchical structure from Markdown files. - GitHub, accessed February 14, 2026, https://github.com/childmindresearch/headhunter
14. Chunk and Vectorize by Document Layout - Azure AI Search | Microsoft Learn, accessed February 14, 2026, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/search-how-to-semantic-chunking
15. Semi-supervised clustering methods - PMC, accessed February 14, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3979639/
16. [PDF] Semi-supervised Clustering by Seeding - Semantic Scholar, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Semi-supervised-Clustering-by-Seeding-Basu-Banerjee/f4f3a10d96e0b6d134e7e347e1727b7438d4006f
17. HERCULES: Hierarchical Embedding-based Recursive Clustering Using LLMs for Efficient Summarization - arXiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2506.19992
18. Question-Driven Analysis and Synthesis: Building Interpretable Thematic Trees with LLMs for Text Clustering and Controllable Generation - arXiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2509.22211v1
19. HiPS: Hierarchical PDF Segmentation of Textbooks - arXiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2509.00909v1
20. leiden_community_detection - Memgraph, accessed February 14, 2026, https://memgraph.com/docs/advanced-algorithms/available-algorithms/leiden_community_detection
21. LLM-Guided Semantic-Aware Clustering for Topic Modeling - ACL Anthology, accessed February 14, 2026, https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.902.pdf
22. BERTopic with Local LLM Labeling (Llama.cpp + Ollama) | by Armin Pasalic - Medium, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/data-science-collective/bertopic-with-local-llm-labeling-llama-cpp-ollama-a-practical-guide-45314e80d723
23. How to Efficiently Store and Query Tree Data in SQL | by ahmet türkgenç | Medium, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@ahmetturkgenc10/how-to-efficiently-store-and-query-tree-data-in-sql-298dc3225547
24. From Trees to Tables: Storing Hierarchical Data in Relational Databases | by Rishabh Dev Manu | Medium, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@rishabhdevmanu/from-trees-to-tables-storing-hierarchical-data-in-relational-databases-a5e5e6e1bd64
25. Embedded Intelligence: How SQLite-vec Delivers Fast, Local Vector Search for AI., accessed February 14, 2026, https://dev.to/aairom/embedded-intelligence-how-sqlite-vec-delivers-fast-local-vector-search-for-ai-3dpb
26. Predicting clusters for new points — hdbscan 0.8.1 documentation, accessed February 14, 2026, https://hdbscan.readthedocs.io/en/latest/prediction_tutorial.html
27. Strategies for Managing Hierarchical Data Structures in SQLite ..., accessed February 14, 2026, https://moldstud.com/articles/p-strategies-for-managing-hierarchical-data-structures-in-sqlite
28. How sqlite-vec Works for Storing and Querying Vector Embeddings | by Stephen Collins, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@stephenc211/how-sqlite-vec-works-for-storing-and-querying-vector-embeddings-165adeeeceea
29. Adapting Language Balance in Code-Switching Speech - arXiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2510.18724v1
30. "Whisper Hebrish": A Code-Switching ASR Fine-Tune for English-Hebrew Immigrant Speech Patterns - Hugging Face, accessed February 14, 2026, https://huggingface.co/blog/danielrosehill/whisper-hebrish
31. BGE Large v1.5 | Products - IONOS Cloud Documentation, accessed February 14, 2026, https://docs.ionos.com/cloud/ai/ai-model-hub/models/embedding-models/bge-large-1-5
32. Bge Large En V1.5 · Models - Dataloop, accessed February 14, 2026, https://dataloop.ai/library/model/baai_bge-large-en-v15/
33. Does embed-multilingual-v3.0 handle code-switching in multilingual text? - Milvus, accessed February 14, 2026, https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/does-embedmultilingualv30-handle-codeswitching-in-multilingual-text
34. The Measurement of Knowledge in Knowledge Graphs - AAAI 2023 Workshop, accessed February 14, 2026, https://r2hcai.github.io/AAAI-23/files/CameraReadys/9.pdf
35. Knowledge Graph KPIs - Meegle, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.meegle.com/en_us/topics/knowledge-graphs/knowledge-graph-kpis
36. Scoring mechanism in hierarchical chunking for Bedrock Knowledge Bases | AWS re:Post, accessed February 14, 2026, https://repost.aws/questions/QUCuPxV2VaTFKxX0O3IecCSg/scoring-mechanism-in-hierarchical-chunking-for-bedrock-knowledge-bases
37. Runpod GPU pricing: A complete breakdown and platform comparison | Blog - Northflank, accessed February 14, 2026, https://northflank.com/blog/runpod-gpu-pricing
38. Top Serverless GPU Clouds for 2026: Comparing Runpod, Modal, and More, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.runpod.io/articles/guides/top-serverless-gpu-clouds
39. Pricing - Runpod, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.runpod.io/pricing
40. Vector Search Resource Optimization Guide - Qdrant, accessed February 14, 2026, https://qdrant.tech/articles/vector-search-resource-optimization/