:::{admonition} Evaluation Result
:class: note
**Generated by:** GPT-5.4 (high) in Codex  
**Codebase:** Serena JetBrains Plugin (Java)  
**Date**: 2026-04-13
:::

# Codex (GPT-5.4, high)


> **One-line summary:** As a coding agent, I would ask my owner to add Serena because it turns fragile text-and-line-number work into precise symbol-aware navigation and
refactoring, which makes real code changes feel faster, safer, and far less blind.

This report compares Serena's JetBrains-backed semantic coding tools with built-in file, shell, search, and patch tools in this repository. The comparison assumes competent use of both toolsets: built-ins are used for text, file, shell, config, and small patch work; Serena is used where symbol identity, language semantics, or IDE refactoring semantics apply.

Method: I explored code first, avoided repo documentation and prior notes, ran real edits/refactors, and reverted after each experiment. After each edit/refactor experiment I checked `git status --short` and returned the tree to clean before moving on. Measurements are approximate, but call counts, diff sizes, and result shapes are from observed runs.

## 1. Headline: what Serena changes

Serena adds a semantic layer over the codebase. Its concrete delta is the ability to address and transform code by symbols: name paths, overload indexes, reference graphs, type hierarchies, external declarations, and JetBrains refactoring operations.

Tasks where Serena adds capability:

- Code-reference search: `find_referencing_symbols` for `Symbol/findReferences` returned 6 precise code usages grouped by containing symbols. `rg findReferences` also returned the declaration, the `/findReferences` route string, and comments.
- Type hierarchy: one `type_hierarchy` call for `PostRequestHandler` returned 18 direct endpoint subclasses, a transitive `TypeHierarchyHandler -> GetSupertypesHandler/GetSubtypesHandler` branch, and the external `Object` supertype.
- External dependency lookup: `find_declaration` resolved `ReferencesSearch.search(anchorElement)` to `<ext:ReferencesSearch.class|466808a0>`, and `find_symbol` returned the selected overload body. Built-in repo/cache grep found the import and call but not the dependency definition.
- Cross-file refactors: semantic rename, symbol move, file move, safe delete, and inline executed real IDE refactors and updated files/usages/imports.
- Stable addressing: a chained edit used `SymbolFinder/findFilesByName`, `SymbolFinder/getProject`, and `SymbolFinder/qualNameMatchesName` after earlier edits shifted line numbers.

Tasks where Serena applies but offered little or no improvement:

- Tiny intra-method edits: a 1-line error-message change was smaller with a built-in patch; Serena body replacement required sending the whole method.
- Simple one-file private rename: manual patch and semantic rename produced the same 2-line diff for `qualNameMatchesName -> qualifiedNameMatchesName`.
- Method insertion at a known spot: both workflows produced the same 4-line diff; Serena's benefit was target stability, not smaller payload.
- Whole-method rewrite: Serena targets the method boundary cleanly, but the full replacement body still has to be sent.

Tasks outside Serena's scope:

- Reading config/non-code files such as `plugin.xml` and `build.gradle.kts`.
- Free-text searches for URLs, endpoint strings, settings values, comments, and resources.
- File inventory, line counts, shell commands, build/test execution, Git operations, and arbitrary text edits.

Value-weighted summary:

| Rank | Difference | Frequency | Value per hit | Delta |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
| 1 | Cross-file semantic refactors | Medium-high | High | Often avoids 5-20 manual edit/search/verify steps and reduces partial-update risk. |
| 2 | Code usages vs text mentions | High | Medium-high | Removes noisy grep triage for "who uses this symbol?" |
| 3 | Symbol overview/body retrieval | High | Medium | Avoids large reads and stale line targeting. |
| 4 | Type hierarchy/implementations | Medium | High | Hard to reproduce correctly with text search, especially transitively. |
| 5 | Stable addressing across edit chains | Medium | Medium | Reduces refresh work after line shifts. |
| 6 | External dependency lookup | Low-medium | High | Needs IDE index; built-ins need source/decompiler infrastructure. |
| 7 | Small local edits | High | Neutral/negative for Serena | Built-in patch/edit usually sends less. |

**Verdict:** Serena materially changes symbol-centric exploration and refactoring; it does not replace built-ins for ordinary text, file, shell, config, or tiny local edits.

## 2. Added value and differences by area

- Cross-file semantic refactoring changes both workflow and correctness. Frequency: medium-high. Value per hit: high. The observed class rename updated a file/class plus imports/usages; the nested-record move changed 4 existing files and created 1 new file; the file move updated package/imports across 3 paths. Built-ins can reproduce the result, but only through search, file moves, patches, import cleanup, and verification.

- Semantic search separates code usage from text mention. Frequency: high. Value per hit: medium-high. Serena returned only code references for `Symbol/findReferences`; `rg` returned code, route strings, comments, and the declaration. Built-ins remain better for "mentioned anywhere."

- Symbol overview/body retrieval cuts exploration payload. Frequency: high. Value per hit: medium. `get_symbols_overview` on `Symbol.java` returned fields, methods, nested classes, and overload indexes without reading the 1,000+ line file. Regex produced line-oriented candidates and still required manual scope interpretation.

- Type/dependency queries add capabilities not practically present in built-ins. Frequency: low-medium. Value per hit: high. Serena returned a transitive type graph and an external IntelliJ API method body; text tools needed iterative searches or extra source/decompiler setup.

- Small localized edits are not improved by symbol-body replacement. Frequency: high. Value per hit: neutral or negative for Serena. A one-line patch was smaller than replacing an 11-line method body.

- Some JetBrains refactors staged added/deleted files. Frequency: limited to class/file move/delete style operations. Value per hit: neutral operational tradeoff. Semantic value remains, but verification/revert must check the index as well as unstaged files.

**Verdict:** Serena's highest-value differences are symbol identity, reference graphs, and IDE refactor execution; built-ins remain superior for simple text-local work.

## 3. Detailed evidence, grouped by capability

### 3.1 Repository structure and entry points

Attempted: identify top-level layout, packages, and entry points.

Built-in call chain:

1. `git status --short` -> clean.
2. `rg --files -g '!*.md' -g '!docs/**' -g '!CLAUDE.md'` -> code/config/resource inventory.
3. `Get-ChildItem -Force` -> top-level directories.
4. `Get-Content src/main/resources/META-INF/plugin.xml` -> plugin entry points.
5. `Get-Content build.gradle.kts -TotalCount 80` -> Gradle/IntelliJ platform setup.

Serena call chain: not applicable for repository inventory and non-code config.

Observed structure:

- `service`: backend service and request handling.
- `service/endpoint`: endpoint handlers for symbol search, references, formatting, rename, move, safe delete, inline, inspections, and completions.
- `symbol`: symbol model, symbol lookup, hierarchy, path matching, and move processors.
- `util`: IDE/project/editor/UI helpers.
- `ui`: tool window content.
- `plugin.xml`: registers `PluginStartupActivity`, settings service/configurable, and a dummy test action.

Payloads: built-ins used 5 small shell/read calls and returned several KB of code/config context; Serena had no relevant semantic operation.

**Verdict:** Repository layout and non-code entry-point discovery are built-in work; Serena starts adding value once the target is code symbols.

### 3.2 Large file structural overview

Attempted: compare structural overview on `src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/symbol/Symbol.java`.

Serena call chain:

1. `get_symbols_overview(relative_path=Symbol.java, depth=1)`
2. Next step: `find_symbol(Symbol/findReferences, include_body=true)`

Serena output: one top-level `Symbol` class; fields; nested `ChildrenCollector` and `DocumentationResolver`; methods including overload-indexed names such as `getLocationString[0]`, `getLocationString[1]`, `move[0]`, `move[1]`, `getDocumentation[0]`, and `getDocumentation[1]`.

Built-in call chain:

1. `rg` for method-like declaration lines in `Symbol.java`.
2. `rg` for class/interface/enum lines in `Symbol.java`.
3. Next step: line-slice read around the selected method.

Built-in output: about 70 line-oriented method/class matches, including nested symbols, with no durable symbol identity beyond manual signature inspection.

Payloads: Serena used 1 compact overview call plus a targeted follow-up. Built-ins used 2 regex searches plus a later line-range read.

**Verdict:** Serena's overview is more actionable because its output feeds directly into stable symbol-addressed calls; regex outlines are useful but line-based.

### 3.3 Targeted method body retrieval

Attempted: retrieve `Symbol/findReferences` without reading surrounding file content.

Serena call chain: `find_symbol(relative_path=Symbol.java, name_path_pattern=Symbol/findReferences, include_body=true)`.

Serena output: only the `public ArrayList<SymbolReference> findReferences()` body.

Built-in call chain:

1. `rg "findReferences\\(" src/main/java -n -C 2`
2. `Get-Content Symbol.java` line slice around the declaration.

Built-in output: search context across multiple files, then the selected method slice.

Payloads: Serena input was one path/name-path request and returned roughly 25 method lines. Built-ins required search output plus a separate slice read.

**Verdict:** If the symbol is known, Serena retrieves the body in one precise call; built-ins need search plus line-targeted reading.

### 3.4 References: code usages vs mentions anywhere

Attempted: find all references to `Symbol/findReferences`.

Serena call chain: `find_referencing_symbols(relative_path=Symbol.java, name_path=Symbol/findReferences)`.

Serena output:

- `Symbol/formatReferenceLocations/references`
- `Symbol/inline/refCountBefore`
- `Symbol/verifyInlineResult/refCountAfter`
- `SymbolDTO/Builder/buildDTO/references`
- `RunInspectionsOnSymbolsHandler/handleRequest/refs`
- `FindReferencesHandler/buildResponse/references`

Built-in call chain: `rg "findReferences" src/main/java -n -C 1`.

Built-in output: same call sites plus the declaration, `/findReferences` route registration, and explanatory comments.

Payloads: Serena returned a compact grouped usage list of about 500-700 characters. `rg` returned broader line context of about 1-2 KB and mixed code usages with text mentions.

**Verdict:** Serena has higher precision for "who uses this symbol in code"; built-ins have higher recall for "where is this text mentioned anywhere."

### 3.5 Type hierarchy

Attempted: list supertypes and subtypes transitively for `PostRequestHandler`.

Serena call chain: `type_hierarchy(relative_path=PostRequestHandler.java, name_path=PostRequestHandler, hierarchy_type=both, depth=0)`.

Serena output: external `Object` supertype; 18 direct endpoint subclasses; transitive nested branch `TypeHierarchyHandler` containing `GetSupertypesHandler` and `GetSubtypesHandler`.

Built-in call chain:

1. `rg "extends PostRequestHandler|extends TypeHierarchyHandler|class PostRequestHandler" src/main/java -n`
2. Manually follow any discovered intermediate types.
3. Repeat searches if deeper hierarchy exists.

Payloads: Serena used 1 hierarchy query and returned structured JSON. Built-ins used pattern search and manual transitive grouping.

**Verdict:** Serena turns hierarchy discovery into a semantic graph query; text search requires iterative pattern expansion and manual reasoning.

### 3.6 External dependency symbol lookup

Attempted: retrieve the IntelliJ dependency symbol behind `ReferencesSearch.search(anchorElement)`.

Serena call chain:

1. `find_declaration(relative_path=Symbol.java, regex="ReferencesSearch\\.(search)\\(anchorElement\\)")`
2. `find_symbol(relative_path=<ext:ReferencesSearch.class|466808a0>, name_path_pattern=ReferencesSearch/search[0], include_body=true, search_deps=true)`

Serena output: declaration `ReferencesSearch/search[0]` in an external class path and the overload body:

```java
public static @NotNull Query<PsiReference> search(@NotNull PsiElement element) {
    return search(element, GlobalSearchScope.allScope(PsiUtilCore.getProjectInReadAction(element)), false);
}
```

Built-in call chain:

1. `rg "ReferencesSearch" src/main/java -n` -> import and local call.
2. `rg` over repo, `.intellijPlatform`, and Gradle caches for `class ReferencesSearch` or matching method signatures -> no useful source hit.
3. `Get-ChildItem` over Gradle/IntelliJ caches -> jar candidates but no direct definition.

Infrastructure difference: Serena depends on the JetBrains IDE index; built-ins need source jars, decompiler tooling, or classpath-specific jar inspection.

**Verdict:** External dependency lookup is a genuine Serena capability when IDE indexes are available; ordinary built-ins do not provide it.

### 3.7 Single-file edits across edit sizes

Small tweak attempted: change `"No symbol found for "` to `"No matching symbol found for "` in `SymbolFinder/findSymbolByNamePath`.

Built-in call chain:

1. Use existing search/body context.
2. `apply_patch` one-line replacement.
3. `git diff`, `git status --short`.
4. Revert and clean check.

Serena call chain:

1. `replace_symbol_body(SymbolFinder/findSymbolByNamePath, full method body with changed string)`.
2. `git diff`, `git status --short`.
3. Revert and clean check.

Observed diff: both produced the same 1-line change. Payload difference: built-in edit input was a tiny hunk; Serena input was the full 11-line method body.

Medium rewrite attempted: rewrite `SymbolFinder/findFilesByName` from list accumulation to stream collection.

Built-in call chain: `apply_patch` over the method body, then diff/status/revert/status.

Serena call chain: `replace_symbol_body(SymbolFinder/findFilesByName, new method body)`, then diff/status/revert/status.

Observed diff: both produced `10 +++-------`, 3 insertions and 7 deletions. Payload difference was small: a patch hunk versus an 8-line replacement method.

Large/whole-body rewrite attempted: rewrite `InspectionRunner/collectResults` while preserving signature and behavior shape.

Built-in call chain: `apply_patch` against the method body, then diff/status/revert/status.

Serena call chain: `replace_symbol_body(InspectionRunner/collectResults, full symbol text including Javadoc and replacement body)`, then diff/status/revert/status.

Observed diff: both produced `38 +++++++++++-----------`, 19 insertions and 19 deletions. Payload difference: built-in required a large contextual hunk; Serena required the full symbol text, about 70 lines including Javadoc/signature/body.

**Verdict:** Serena is not automatically more token-efficient for edits; its edit advantage is stable symbol targeting, while built-ins are smaller for tiny local hunks.

### 3.8 Insert method at structural location

Attempted: insert `private Logger getLogger()` immediately after `SymbolFinder/getProject`.

Built-in call chain:

1. Search/read surrounding area.
2. `apply_patch` with nearby context.
3. Diff/status/revert/status.

Serena call chain:

1. `insert_after_symbol(relative_path=SymbolFinder.java, name_path=SymbolFinder/getProject, body=...)`
2. Diff/status/revert/status.

Observed diff: both produced the same 4-line insertion.

Payloads: built-ins sent inserted body plus surrounding text context; Serena sent inserted body plus symbol target.

**Verdict:** Structural insertion is a modest Serena improvement: same resulting diff, less dependence on line/context stability.

### 3.9 Rename: private helper in one file

Attempted: rename `SymbolFinder/qualNameMatchesName` to `qualifiedNameMatchesName`.

Built-in call chain:

1. `rg "qualNameMatchesName" SymbolFinder.java -n -C 2`
2. `apply_patch` declaration and one call site.
3. Diff/status/revert/status.

Serena call chain:

1. `find_referencing_symbols(SymbolFinder/qualNameMatchesName)` -> one referencing method.
2. `rename(name_path=SymbolFinder/qualNameMatchesName, new_name=qualifiedNameMatchesName, rename_in_comments=true, rename_in_text_occurrences=true)`.
3. Diff/status/revert/status.

Observed result: Serena returned `"Success"`. Both produced the same 2-line diff.

**Verdict:** Semantic rename has little advantage for a one-file helper with one call site, but it scales better than text edits as references spread or names become ambiguous.

### 3.10 Rename: cross-file class including imports

Attempted: rename `MoveOperationFailedException` to `MoveFailedException`.

Serena call chain:

1. `rename(relative_path=MoveOperationFailedException.java, name_path=MoveOperationFailedException, new_name=MoveFailedException, rename_in_comments=true, rename_in_text_occurrences=true)`.
2. `git diff --stat`, `git diff`, `git diff --cached --stat`, `git status --short`.
3. Restore staged rename and modified files; clean check.

Serena result: `"Success"`.

Observed edits:

- Added/staged `MoveFailedException.java`.
- Deleted/staged `MoveOperationFailedException.java`.
- Updated import, Javadoc comment, and thrown class in `MoveProcessor.java`.

Built-in equivalent chain:

1. `rg "MoveOperationFailedException" src/main/java -n`.
2. Rename/create/delete file.
3. Patch class name and constructor.
4. Patch imports and usages.
5. Patch comments/text occurrences if desired.
6. Verify no unintended old references remain.
7. Compile/test for a permanent change.

**Verdict:** Cross-file class renames are high-value Serena cases because file/class coupling, imports, usages, and optional comments are handled as one semantic refactor.

### 3.11 Move symbol to another file context

Attempted: move nested record `InspectionRunner/PendingFix` to a top-level file in the same package.

Serena call chain:

1. `move(relative_path=InspectionRunner.java, name_path=InspectionRunner/PendingFix, target_relative_path=src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/service/endpoint)`.
2. Diff/status/cached-diff inspection.
3. Restore staged new file and modified files; clean check.

Serena result:

```json
{
  "source_relative_path": "src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/service/endpoint/InspectionRunner.java",
  "target_relative_path": "src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/service/endpoint",
  "moved_symbol": {"name_path": "PendingFix", "type": "CLASS"}
}
```

Observed edits:

- Created/staged `PendingFix.java` with package and imports.
- Removed nested record from `InspectionRunner.java`.
- Updated 3 external references from `InspectionRunner.PendingFix` to `PendingFix`.
- Removed unused imports in 2 files.

Built-in equivalent chain: read nested record/import needs, add file, delete nested symbol, search usages, patch qualified usages, patch internal references if needed, remove imports, verify, compile/test.

**Verdict:** Symbol move is a substantial Serena addition because the difficult part is reference/import repair, not copying text.

### 3.12 Move file/package location

Attempted: move `PluginUtil.java` from `util` to `service`.

Serena call chain:

1. `move(relative_path=src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/util/PluginUtil.java, target_relative_path=src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/service)`.
2. Diff/status/cached-diff inspection.
3. Restore staged rename and modified imports; clean check.

Serena result:

```json
{
  "source_relative_path": "src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/util/PluginUtil.java",
  "target_relative_path": "src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/service"
}
```

Observed edits:

- Staged rename `util/PluginUtil.java -> service/PluginUtil.java`.
- Changed package declaration to `de.oraios.serena.service`.
- Updated import in `PluginStartupActivity`.
- Removed now-unneeded same-package import in `SerenaBackendService`.

Built-in equivalent chain: move file, patch package declaration, search `PluginUtil`, patch imports/usages, remove redundant imports, verify no old package import remains, compile/test.

**Verdict:** File moves are high-value when packages/imports must change; built-ins can do them manually but require dependency repair steps.

### 3.13 Safe delete and propagated delete

Attempted: delete unused `DebugUtil`.

Serena call chain:

1. `safe_delete(relative_path=DebugUtil.java, name_path=DebugUtil, delete_even_if_used=false, propagate=false)`.
2. `git diff --cached --stat`, `git status --short`.
3. Restore staged deletion; clean check.

Serena result:

```json
{
  "deleted_symbol": "DebugUtil",
  "relative_path": "src/main/java/de/oraios/serena/util/DebugUtil.java",
  "affected_references": [],
  "message": "Symbol deleted successfully with no affected references."
}
```

Built-in equivalent chain: `rg "DebugUtil"`, inspect declaration vs usages, delete file/symbol, verify no remaining usages.

Propagated deletion: no suitable correct-use candidate was found where JetBrains safe-delete propagation would meaningfully delete a used symbol and propagate deletion through call sites. For ordinary used-method deletion, correct safe delete reports usages or, if forced, deletes the symbol and reports affected references; that is not the same as arbitrary call-site deletion.

**Verdict:** Safe delete adds an integrated usage check plus deletion operation; propagated deletion was not evaluated because this codebase did not provide a suitable candidate.

### 3.14 Inline

Attempted: inline `ProjectUtil/getAbsolutePath`, a single-expression helper.

Serena call chain:

1. `find_symbol(ProjectUtil/getAbsolutePath, include_body=true)`.
2. `find_referencing_symbols(ProjectUtil/getAbsolutePath)` -> 2 references.
3. `inline_symbol(relative_path=ProjectUtil.java, name_path=ProjectUtil/getAbsolutePath, keep_definition=false)`.
4. Diff/status/revert/status.

Serena result: `{"status": "SUCCESS"}`.

Observed edits:

- Removed `getAbsolutePath`.
- Replaced internal call in `ProjectUtil/getVirtualFile`.
- Replaced external call in `RefreshFileHandler`.

Built-in equivalent chain: read helper body, `rg getAbsolutePath`, patch each call site with substituted expression, delete helper, verify no stale references, compile/test.

**Verdict:** Inline is a strong Serena refactor for legally substitutable helpers; built-ins can reproduce it but must manually adapt each substitution.

### 3.15 Scope precision and overload targeting

Attempted: distinguish overloaded `Symbol/getLocationString` methods.

Serena call chain:

1. `find_symbol(Symbol/getLocationString[0], include_body=true)`.
2. `find_symbol(Symbol/getLocationString[1], include_body=true)`.

Serena output:

- `[0]`: `public String getLocationString() { return getLocationString(element); }`
- `[1]`: `private static String getLocationString(PsiElement element) { ... }`

Built-in call chain: `rg "getLocationString" Symbol.java -n -C 1`, then manual signature inspection.

**Verdict:** Serena's overload-indexed name paths provide precise symbol addressing that text search does not.

### 3.16 Atomicity and success signals

Observed Serena success signals:

- `replace_symbol_body` -> `OK`
- `insert_after_symbol` -> `OK`
- `rename` -> `"Success"`
- `move` -> JSON with source/target/moved symbol or paths
- `safe_delete` -> JSON with deleted symbol, affected references, and message
- `inline_symbol` -> `{"status": "SUCCESS"}`

Built-in success signals:

- `apply_patch` -> "Success. Updated the following files"
- Shell/Git commands -> exit codes and textual output
- Cross-file consistency -> user-driven diff/search/build verification

Atomicity comparison: Serena refactors executed as single IDE operations. Built-in equivalents are chains of searches, file operations, and patches; a competent user can make them correct, but intermediate states can be partial.

Tradeoff: class/file move/delete refactors staged added/deleted files in the Git index, so clean verification must check both staged and unstaged state.

**Verdict:** Serena gives clearer semantic success signals and more atomic cross-file edits; built-ins require manual consistency management.

### 3.17 Workflow effects across multiple edits

Attempted: chain 3 edits in `SymbolFinder.java` without refreshing between them.

Serena call chain:

1. `replace_symbol_body(SymbolFinder/findFilesByName, ...)`.
2. `insert_after_symbol(SymbolFinder/getProject, ...)`.
3. `rename(SymbolFinder/qualNameMatchesName, ...)`.
4. Diff/status/revert/status.

Observed result: all edits applied after earlier edits shifted file positions. Final diff touched 18 lines with net 9 insertions and 9 deletions.

Built-in equivalent chain: initial read/search, apply first patch, rely on robust patch context or refresh line numbers, apply second patch, refresh or search again, apply rename patch, verify.

**Verdict:** Serena's name paths remain useful after line shifts, so its advantage compounds in multi-edit sessions.

### 3.18 Non-code reads and free-text search

Attempted: read config and search free text.

Built-in call chain:

1. `Get-Content plugin.xml`.
2. `Get-Content build.gradle.kts -TotalCount 80`.
3. `rg "http://|https://|localhost|127\\.0\\.0\\.1|8080|24282|SERENA|serena" src/main/java src/main/resources -n`.

Serena call chain: not applicable.

Observed result: built-ins exposed plugin registration, Gradle platform setup, URLs, IDs, settings defaults, and resource/text mentions.

**Verdict:** Built-ins are natural and sufficient for config reading and free-text search; this is outside Serena's semantic-code scope.

## 4. Token-efficiency analysis

Payload differences across edit sizes:

| Task | Built-in payload | Serena payload | More efficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-line string tweak | Tiny patch hunk, 1 changed line | Full 11-line method body | Built-ins |
| Medium method rewrite | 10-line diff hunk | Full 8-line replacement method | Roughly equal |
| Large body rewrite | Large contextual patch, 38-line diff | Full symbol text, about 70 lines | Roughly equal; Serena has better target |
| Insert method | Inserted body plus surrounding context | Inserted body plus name path | Serena slightly |
| Private one-file rename | `rg` plus 2-line patch | optional refs query plus rename command | Roughly equal |
| Cross-file rename/move/inline | Multiple searches, file operations, patches, verifications | One semantic refactor plus diff/status | Serena |

Forced reads:

- Built-ins commonly need a search before a precise read, then a line slice or full context before editing.
- Serena can skip full-file reads when the symbol name path is known.
- When the symbol is not known, Serena's `get_symbols_overview` and shallow `find_symbol` calls provide compact discovery rather than full-file reads.

Output payload:

- Serena exploration output is structured and scoped to symbols.
- Built-in grep output can be larger because it includes declarations, comments, strings, and unrelated text mentions.
- Built-ins can be extremely low-output for known-location small edits.

Stable vs ephemeral addressing:

- Built-ins address code by file paths, line numbers, text context, or byte positions. Line numbers and slices go stale after edits.
- Serena addresses symbols by `relative_path + name_path`, with overload indexes where needed. The chained-edit experiment showed those targets survived line shifts.
- Path-changing operations still require updated paths afterward, so symbol stability is strongest before moves/renames that alter file locations.

**Verdict:** Serena saves tokens by avoiding broad reads/search triage and by collapsing multi-file edit chains; built-ins remain more token-efficient for tiny known-location hunks.

## 5. Reliability & correctness under correct use

Precision of matching:

- Serena reference search returned code usages and excluded route strings/comments.
- Built-in text search returned all mentions and therefore mixed true code usage with broader text hits.
- Serena overload indexes targeted `Symbol/getLocationString[0]` and `[1]`; text search required manual signature inspection.

Scope disambiguation:

- Serena name paths encode class nesting and overload identity.
- Built-ins can disambiguate with careful patterns and reads, but the disambiguation is manual.
- In simple cases, such as a private helper with one call site, this semantic precision had little practical value. In overloaded, nested, or cross-file cases, it materially reduced ambiguity.

Atomicity:

- Serena refactors apply through JetBrains refactoring operations and produce one operation-level success signal.
- Built-in equivalents are decomposed into separate searches, file moves, patches, and verification steps.
- Competent users can verify either path, but Serena reduces the number of intermediate inconsistent states.

Semantic queries vs text search:

- `type_hierarchy` and dependency declaration lookup produced semantic information not available from ordinary grep.
- `rg` remained better for broad mention searches and config/resource scans.

External dependency limitations:

- Serena's dependency lookup depends on IDE/language indexes and available dependency metadata.
- Built-ins can match or exceed it only if paired with source jars, decompilers, or separate language-server tooling.

Operational tradeoff:

- Several Serena refactors staged created/deleted files. This is not a correctness problem, but it adds index-state verification to the cleanup workflow.

**Verdict:** Serena improves correctness where symbol identity and cross-file semantics matter; built-ins remain reliable and simpler for text/file tasks.

## 6. Workflow effects across a session

Where Serena advantages compound:

- Symbol overview results become inputs to body reads, reference searches, renames, moves, safe deletes, and inline operations.
- Name paths remain useful after line shifts, reducing re-read/re-target work during multi-edit sessions.
- Refactor-heavy sessions benefit because one semantic command replaces search/edit/verify loops across files.

Where Serena advantages diminish:

- After a full file has already been read, overview adds less incremental value.
- If the task is a small textual substitution in a known place, symbolic body replacement can cost more payload than a tiny patch.
- For non-code and free-text work, Serena has no role.

Intermediate result durability:

- Serena intermediate results such as `SymbolFinder/findFilesByName` or `Symbol/getLocationString[1]` remain meaningful as long as the file/symbol still exists.
- Built-in line numbers became stale after insertions; robust textual patch context remained usable when surrounding lines did not change.

Verification cost:

- Both workflows still need `git diff`, build/test, and domain-specific verification for permanent changes.
- Serena success signals reduce the need to inspect every call site manually, but not the need to inspect the intended diff.

**Verdict:** Serena's advantages compound inside symbol-centric sessions and diminish once the work becomes plain text, config, shell, or already-loaded single-file editing.

## 7. Unique capabilities

Unique here means no practical built-in equivalent without adding separate language-server, IDE, source-index, or decompiler infrastructure.

- Transitive type hierarchy. Frequency: medium. Impact: high when changing base classes, interfaces, or handler contracts. Built-ins can grep explicit `extends` clauses but do not produce a semantic transitive graph or external supertypes.

- External dependency declaration/body lookup from a call site. Frequency: low-medium. Impact: high for API behavior questions. Serena resolved `ReferencesSearch.search` into an external class method body; ordinary built-ins did not.

- IDE semantic move of a nested symbol to a top-level file with usage/import repair. Frequency: low-medium. Impact: high during refactors. Built-ins can reproduce this only as a manual multi-step refactor.

- Safe delete with semantic usage check. Frequency: medium. Impact: medium-high. Built-ins can search and delete, but they do not provide an integrated safe-delete operation over code usages.

- Inline refactor with call-site substitution. Frequency: low-medium. Impact: medium-high. Built-ins can patch substitutions manually, but expression adaptation and helper deletion are not primitive text operations.

Not unique: reading files, listing files, grep, small patches, simple one-file renames, config/resource understanding, and shell/Git operations.

**Verdict:** Serena's unique practical capabilities are hierarchy/dependency queries and IDE refactors; its non-unique areas are ordinary text and file operations.

## 8. Tasks outside Serena's scope

Built-in-only or built-in-natural tasks observed:

- Repository inventory and top-level layout.
- Reading `plugin.xml`, `build.gradle.kts`, scripts, resources, and generated artifacts.
- Free-text search for URLs, settings strings, endpoint strings, magic constants, resource IDs, and comments.
- Running shell commands, builds, tests, Git operations, and filesystem cleanup.
- Small text edits where a one-line patch is the whole task.

Estimated share of daily coding work:

- About 30-50% of a normal coding session is built-in-natural: shell, tests, grep, config reads, small text patches, and Git checks.
- Serena applies to much of the remaining 50-70% when the work is code navigation, symbol understanding, references, hierarchy, or refactoring.
- Serena coverage rises in refactor-heavy sessions and falls in config/debug/test-log sessions.

**Verdict:** Serena augments the semantic-code portion of development; built-ins still carry a large and necessary share of routine work.

## 9. Practical usage rule

Use Serena when the task can be stated as a code-symbol operation:

- "What methods/classes are in this file?"
- "Give me this method body."
- "Who uses this symbol?"
- "What implements/subclasses this?"
- "Rename, move, delete, or inline this symbol and update usages."
- "Find the declaration of this call, including dependency symbols."
- "Apply several edits where line locations may shift."

Use built-ins when the task is text, file, shell, config, or tiny local editing:

- "List files."
- "Read config."
- "Search for this string anywhere."
- "Change this one known line."
- "Run tests/build."
- "Inspect Git state."
- "Edit markdown/resources/scripts."

For mixed workflows:

1. Use built-ins to find files/config and run verification.
2. Use Serena to identify and transform code symbols.
3. Use built-ins to inspect final diffs and run tests.
4. Prefer built-ins for tiny local hunks after the symbol has already been located.
5. Prefer Serena for any refactor that crosses file boundaries or depends on type/reference semantics.

**Verdict:** Choose Serena for symbol identity and semantic refactoring; choose built-ins for text, shell, config, verification, and minimal local edits.
